CoffeeScript Slides

Posted on April 15, 2011 by Scott Leberknight

Today is the Near Infinity Spring Conference. We have one conference in the fall and one in the spring for all our developers as well as invited guests. Today I gave a presentation on CoffeeScript and shared the slides here.

Introducing RJava

Posted on March 31, 2011 by Scott Leberknight

You’ve no doubt heard about JRuby, which lets you run Ruby code on the JVM. This is nice, but wouldn’t it be nicer if you could write Java code on a Ruby VM? This would let you take advantage of the power of Ruby 1.9’s new YARV (Yet Another Ruby VM) interpreter while letting you write code in a statically-typed language. Without further ado, I’d like to introduce RJava, which does just that!

RJava lets you write code in Java and run it on a Ruby VM! And you still get the full benefit of the Java compiler to ensure your code is 100% correct. Of course with Java you also get checked exceptions and proper interfaces and abstract classes to ensure compliance with your design. You no longer need to worry about whether an object responds to a random message, because the Java compiler will enforce that it does.

You get all this and more but on the power and flexibility of a Ruby VM. And because Java does not support closures, you are ensured that everything is properly designed since you’ll be able to define interfaces and then implement anonymous inner classes just like you’re used to doing! Even when JDK 8 arrives sometime in the future with lambdas, you can rest assured that they will be statically typed.

As a first example, let’s see how you could filter a collection in RJava to find only the even numbers from one to ten. In Ruby you’d probably write something like this:

evens = (1..10).find_all { |n| n % 2 == 0 }

With RJava, you’d write this:

List<Integer> evens = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) {
  if (i % 2 == 0) {
    evens.add(i);
  }
}

This example shows the benefits of declaring variables with specific types, how you can use interfaces (e.g. List in the example) when declaring variables, and shows how you also get the benefits of Java generics to ensure your collections are always type-safe. Without any doubt you know that “evens” is a List containing Integers and that “i” is an int, so you can sleep soundly knowing your code is correct. You can also see Java’s powerful “for” loop at work here, to easily traverse from 1 to 10, inclusive. Finally, you saw how to effectively use Java’s braces to organize code to clearly show blocks, and semi-colons ensure you always know where lines terminate.

I’ve just released RJava on GitHub, so go check it out. Please download RJava today and give it a try and let me know what you think!

Database-Backed Refreshable Beans with Groovy and Spring 3

Posted on October 30, 2010 by Scott Leberknight

In 2009 I published a two-part series of articles on IBM developerWorks entitled Groovier Spring. The articles showed how Spring supports implementing beans in Groovy whose behavior can be changed at runtime via the "refreshable beans" feature. This feature essentially detects when a Spring bean backed by a Groovy script has changed, recompiles it, and replaces the old bean with the new one. This feature is pretty powerful in certain scenarios, for example in PDF generation; mail or any kind of template generation; and as a way to implement runtime modifiable business rules. One specific use case I showed was how to implement PDF generation where the Groovy scripts reside in a database, allowing you to change how PDFs are generated by simply updating Groovy scripts in your database.

In order to load Groovy scripts from a database, I showed how to implement custom ScriptFactoryPostProcessor and ScriptSource classes. The CustomScriptFactoryPostProcessor extends the default Spring ScriptFactoryPostProcessor and overrides the convertToScriptSource method to recognize a database-based script, e.g. you could specify a script source of database:com/nearinfinity/demo/GroovyPdfGenerator.groovy. There is also DatabaseScriptSource that implements the ScriptSource interface and which knows how to load Groovy scripts from a database.

In order to put these pieces together, you need to do a bit of configuration. In the articles I used Spring 2.5.x which was current at the time in early 2009. The configuration looked like this:

<bean id="dataSource"
  class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource">
    <!-- set data source props, e.g. driverClassName, url, username, password... -->
</bean>

<bean id="scriptFactoryPostProcessor"
  class="com.nearinfinity.spring.scripting.support.CustomScriptFactoryPostProcessor">
    <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
</bean>

<lang:groovy id="pdfGenerator"
  script-source="database:com/nearinfinity/demo/DemoGroovyPdfGenerator.groovy">
    <lang:property name="companyName" value="Database Groovy Bookstore"/>
</lang:groovy>

In Spring 2.5.x this works because the <lang:groovy> tag looks for a Spring bean with id "scriptFactoryPostProcessor" and if one exists it uses it, if not it creates it. In the above configuration we created our own "scriptFactoryPostProcessor" bean for <lang:groovy> tags to utilize. So all's well...until you move to Spring 3.x at which point the above configuration no longer works. This was pointed out to me by João from Brazil who tried the sample code in the articles with Spring 3.x, and it did not work. After trying a bunch of things, we eventually determined that in Spring 3.x the <lang:groovy> tag looks for a ScriptFactoryPostProcessor bean whose id is "org.springframework.scripting.config.scriptFactoryPostProcessor" not just "scriptFactoryPostProcessor." So once you figure this out, it is easy to change the above configuration to:

<bean id="org.springframework.scripting.config.scriptFactoryPostProcessor"
  class="com.nearinfinity.spring.scripting.support.CustomScriptFactoryPostProcessor">
    <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
</bean>

<lang:groovy id="pdfGenerator"
  script-source="database:com/nearinfinity/demo/DemoGroovyPdfGenerator.groovy">
    <lang:property name="companyName" value="Database Groovy Bookstore"/>
</lang:groovy>

Then, everything works as expected and the Groovy scripts can reside in your database and be automatically reloaded when you change them. So if you download the article sample code as-is, it will work since the bundled Spring version is 2.5.4, but if you update to Spring 3.x then you'll need to modify the configuration in applicationContext.xml for example #7 (EX #7) as shown above to change the "scriptFactoryPostProcessor" bean to be "org.springframework.scripting.config.scriptFactoryPostProcessor." Note there is a scheduled JIRA issue SPR-5106 that will make the ScriptFactoryPostProcessor mechanism pluggable, so that you won't need to extend the default ScriptFactoryPostProcessor and replace the default bean, etc. But until then, this hack continues to work pretty well.

Rack Lightning Talk

Posted on October 21, 2010 by Scott Leberknight

I gave a short lightning talk on Rack tonight at the NovaRUG. It's on slideshare here. Rack is really cool because it makes creating modular functionality really easy. For example, if you want to have exceptions mailed to you you can use the Rack::MailExceptions middleware, or if you want responses compressed you can add one line of code to a Rails app to use Rack::Deflater. Cool.

Missing the each_line method in FakeFS version 0.2.1? Add it!

Posted on May 06, 2010 by Scott Leberknight

Recently we have been using the excellent FakeFS (fake filesystem) gem in some specs to test code that reads and writes files on the filesystem. We are using the latest release version of this gem which is 0.2.1 as I am writing this. Some of the code under test uses the IO each_line method to iterate lines in relatively largish files. But we found out quickly that is a problem, since in version 0.2.1 the FakeFS::File class does not extend StringIO and so you don't get all its methods such as each_line. (The version on master in GitHub as I write this does extend StringIO, but it is not yet released as a formal version.) As an example suppose we have the following code that prints out the size of each line in a file as stars (asterisks):

def lines_to_stars(file_path)
  File.open(file_path, 'r').each_line { |line| puts '*' * line.size }
end

Let's say we use FakeFS to create a fake file like this:

require 'fakefs/safe'
require 'stringio'

FakeFS.activate!

File.open('/tmp/foo.txt', 'w') do |f|
  f.write "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog\n"
  f.write "The quick red fox jumped over the sleepy cat\n"
  f.write "Jack be nimble, Jack be quick, Jack jumped over the candle stick\n"
  f.write "Twinkle, twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are\n"
  f.write "The End."
end

So far, so good. But now if we call lines_to_stars we get an error:

NoMethodError: undefined method `each_line' for #<FakeFS::File:0x000001012c22b8>

Oops. No each_line. If you don't want to use an unreleased version of the gem, you can add each_line onto FakeFS::File using the following code:

module FakeFS
  class File
    def each_line
      File.readlines(self.path).each { |line| yield line }
    end
  end
end

Basically all it does is define each_line so that it reads all the lines from a (fake) file on the (fake) filesystem and then yields them up one by one, so you can have code under test that iterates a file and work as expected. So now calling lines_to_stars gives a nice pretty bar chart containing the line sizes represented by stars:

********************************************
********************************************
***************************************************************
*******************************************************
********

Since we're using RSpec, to make this work nicely we added the above code that defines each_line into a file named fakefs.rb in the spec/support directory, since spec_helper requires supporting files in the spec/support directory and its subdirectories. So now all our specs automatically get the each_line behavior when using FakeFS.

Using Keynote Remote When There's No Wi-Fi Around

Posted on January 24, 2010 by Scott Leberknight

I just bought Keynote Remote for my iPhone. It is very simple, has the option to display presenter notes, and is absurdly simple to link to Keynote and start controlling presentations. What was a little more involved was that I wanted to use it regardless of whether there is a wireless network around or not. Since Keynote Remote requires a wi-fi connection here's what I'm doing to get around this little annoyance. Basically all you need to do is set up an ad-hoc wireless network with your Mac, and have your iPhone connect to that network. Voila! So, when there's no wireless network available, I just use my handy-dandy Verizon Wireless USB760 Modem to connect to the Internet, and I can still control presentations with Keynote Remote.

Hibernate Performance Tuning Part 2 Article Published

Posted on December 21, 2009 by Scott Leberknight

I've just published the second article of a two-part series in the December 2009 NFJS Magazine on Hibernate Performance Tuning. Here's the abstract:

Tuning performance in Hibernate applications is all about reducing the number of database queries or eliminating them entirely using caching. In the first article in this two part series, you saw how to tune object retrieval using eager fetching techniques to optimize queries and avoid lazy-loads. In this second and final article, I’ll show you how inheritance strategy affects performance, how to eliminate queries using the Hibernate second-level cache, and show some simple but effective tools you can use to monitor and profile your applications.

If you are using Hibernate and want to know more about how inheritance affects performance, how to use the second-level cache, and some simple monitoring and profiling techniques, check it out and let me know what you think. Note that NFJS Magazine does require a subscription.

Making Cobertura Reports Show Groovy Code with Maven

Posted on December 15, 2009 by Scott Leberknight

A recent project started out life as an all-Java project that used Maven as the build tool. Initially we used Atlassian Clover to measure unit test coverage. Clover is a great product for Java code, but unfortunately it only works with Java code because it works at the Java source level. (This was the case as of Spring 2009, and I haven't checked since then.) As we started migrating existing code from Java to Groovy and writing new code in Groovy, we started to lose data about unit test coverage because Clover does not understand Groovy code. To remedy this problem we switched from Clover to Cobertura, which instruments at the bytecode level and thus works with Groovy code. Theoretically it would also work with any JVM-based language but I'm not sure whether or not it could handle something like Clojure or not.

In any case, we only cared about Groovy so Cobertura was a good choice. With the Cobertura Maven plugin we quickly found a problem, which was that even though the code coverage was running, the reports only showed coverage for Java code, not Groovy. This blog shows you how to display coverage on Groovy code when using Maven and the Cobertura plugin. In other words, I'll show how to get Cobertura reports to link to the real Groovy source code in Maven, so you can navigate Cobertura reports as you normally would.

The core problem is pretty simple, though it took me a while to figure out how to fix it. Seems to be pretty standard in Maven: I know what I want to do, but finding out how to do it is the really hard part. The only thing you need to do is tell Maven about the Groovy source code and where it lives. The way I did this is to use the Codehaus build-helper-maven-plugin which has an add-source goal. The add-source goal does just what you would expect; it adds a specified directory (or directories) as a source directory in your Maven build. Here's how you use it in your Maven pom.xml file:

<plugin>
    <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
    <artifactId>build-helper-maven-plugin</artifactId>
    <executions>
        <execution>
            <phase>generate-sources</phase>
            <goals>
                <goal>add-source</goal>
            </goals>
            <configuration>
                <sources>
                    <source>src/main/groovy</source>
                </sources>
            </configuration>
        </execution>
    </executions>
</plugin>

In the above code snippet, we're using the "build-helper-maven-plugin" to add the src/main/groovy directory. That's pretty much it. Run Cobertura as normal, view the reports, and you should now see coverage on Groovy source code as well as Java.

Hibernate Performance Tuning Part 1 Article Published

Posted on December 01, 2009 by Scott Leberknight

I've just published an article in the November 2009 NFJS Magazine on Hibernate Performance Tuning. Here's the abstract:

Many developers treat Hibernate like a "black box" and assume it will simply "Do the Right Thing" when it comes to all things related to the underlying database. This is a faulty assumption because, while Hibernate is great at the mechanics of database interaction, it cannot and will likely not ever be able to figure out the specific details of your domain model and discern the most efficient and best performing data access strategies. In this first article of a two part series, I'll show you how to achieve better performance in your Hibernate applications by focusing on tuning object retrieval, which forms the basis of your "fetch plan" for finding and storing objects in the database.

If you are using Hibernate and want to know more about how to change how objects are fetched from the database, check it out and let me know what you think. Note that NFJS Magazine does require a subscription.

Can Java Be Saved?

Posted on November 09, 2009 by Scott Leberknight

Java and Evolution

The Java language has been around for a pretty long time, and in my view is now a stagnant language. I don't consider it dead because I believe it will be around for probably decades if not longer. But it appears to have reached its evolutionary peak, and it doesn't look it's going to be evolved any further. This is not due to problems inherent in the language itself. Instead it seems the problem lies with Java's stewards (Sun and the JCP) and their unwillingness to evolve the language to keep it current and modern, and more importantly the goal to keep backward compatibility at all costs. Not just Sun, but also it seems the large corporations with correspondingly large investments in Java like IBM and Oracle aren't exactly chomping at the bit to improve Java. I don't even know if they think it even needs improvement at all. So really, the ultra-conservative attitude towards change and evolution is the problem with Java from my admittedly limited view of things.

That's why I don't hate Java. But, I do hate the way it has been treated by the people charged with improving it. It is clear many in the Java community want things like closures and a native property syntax but instead we got Project Coin. This, to me, is sad really. It is a shame that things like closures and native properties were not addressed in Java/JDK/whatever-it-is-called 7.

Why Not?

I want to know why Java can't be improved. We have concrete examples that it is possible to change a major language in major ways. Even in ways that break backward compatibility in order to evolve and improve. Out with the old, in with the new. Microsoft with C# showed that you can successfully evolve a language over time in major ways. For example C# has always had a property syntax but it now also has many features found in dynamically typed and functional languages such as type inference and, effectively, closures. With LINQ it introduced functional concepts. When C# added generics they did it correctly and retained the type information in the compiled IL, whereas Java used type-erasure and simply dropped the types from the compiled bytecode. There is a great irony here: though C# began life about five or six years after Java, it not only has caught up but has surpassed Java in most if not all ways, and has continued to evolve while Java has become stagnant.

C# is not the only example. Python 3 is a major overhaul of the Python language, and it introduced breaking changes that are not backwards compatible. I believe they provide a migration tool to assist you should you want to move from the 2.x series to version 3 and beyond. Microsoft has done this kind of thing as well. I remember when they made Visual Basic conform to the .NET platform and introduced some rather gut wrenching (for VB developers anyway) changes, and they also provided a tool to aid the transition. One more recent example is Objective-C which has experienced a resurgence in importance mainly because of the iPhone. Objective-C has been around longer than all of Java, C#, Ruby, Python, etc. since the 1980s. Apple has made improvements to Objective-C and it now sports a way to define and synthesize properties and most recently added blocks (effectively closures). If a language that pre-dates Java (Python also pre-dates Java by the way) can evolve, I just don't get why Java can't.

While it is certainly possible to remain on older versions of software, forcing yourself to upgrade can be a Good Thing, because it ensures you don't get the "COBOL Syndrome" where you end up with nothing but binaries that have to run on a specific hardware platform forever and you are trapped until you rewrite or you go out of business. The other side of this, of course, is that organizations don't have infinite time, money, and resources to update every single application. Sometimes this too can be good, because it forces you to triage older systems, and possibly consolidate or outright eliminate them if they have outlived their usefulness. In order to facilitate large transitions, I believe it is very important to use tools that help automate the upgrade process, e.g. tools that analyze code and fix it if possible (reporting all changes in a log) and which provide warnings and guidance when a simple fix isn't possible.

The JVM Platform

Before I get into the changes I'd make to Java to make it not feel like I'm developing with a straightjacket on while having to type masses of unnecessary boilerplate code, I want to say that I think the JVM is a great place to be. Obviously the JVM itself facilitates developing all kinds of languages as evidenced by the huge number of languages that run on the JVM. The most popular ones and most interesting ones these days are probably JRuby, Scala, Groovy, and Clojure though there are probably hundreds more. So I suppose you could make an argument that Java doesn't need to evolve any more because we can simply use a more modern language that runs on the JVM.

The main problem I have with that argument is simply that there is already a ton of Java code out there, and there are many organizations who are simply not going to allow other JVM-based languages; they're going to stick with Java for the long haul, right or wrong. This means there is a good chance that even if you can manage convince someone to try writing that shiny new web app using Scala and its Lift framework, JRuby on Rails, Grails, or Clojure, chances are at some point you'll also need to maintain or enhance existing large Java codebases. Wouldn't you like to be able to first upgrade to a version of Java that has closures, native property syntax, method/property handles, etc?

Next I'll choose what would be my top three choices to make Java much better immediately.

Top Three Java Improvements

If given the chance to change just three things about Java to make it better, I would choose these:

  • Remove checked exceptions
  • Add closures
  • Add formal property support

I think these three changes along would make coding in Java much, much better. Let's see how.

Remove Checked Exceptions

By removing checked exceptions you eliminate a ton of boilerplate try/catch clauses that do nothing except log a message, wrap and re-throw as a RuntimeException, pollute the API with throws clauses all over the place, or worst of all empty catch blocks that can cause very subtle and evil bugs. With unchecked exceptions, developers still have the option to catch exceptions that they can actually handle. It would be interesting to see how many times in a typical Java codebase people actually handle exceptions and do something at the point of exception, or whether they simply punt it away for the caller to handle, who in turn also punts, and so forth all the way up the call stack until some global handler catches it or the program crashes. If I were a betting man, I'd bet a lot of money that for most applications, developers punt the vast majority of the time. So why force people to handle something they cannot possible handle?

Add Closures

I specifically listed removing checked exceptions first, because to me it is the first step to being able to have a closure/block syntax that isn't totally horrendous. If you remove checked exceptions, then adding closures would seem to be much easier since you don't need to worry at all about what exceptions could possibly be thrown and there is obviously no need to declare exceptions. Closures/blocks would lead to better ability to handle collections, for example as in Groovy but in Java you would still have types (note I'm also using a literal property syntax here):

// Find all people whose last name is "Smith"
List<Person> peeps = people.findAll { Person person -> person.lastName.equals("Smith");   } 
or
// Create a list of names by projecting the name property of a bunch of Person objects
List<String> names = people.collect { Person person -> person.name; }

Not quite as clean as Groovy but still much better than the for loops that would traditionally be required (or trying to shoehorn functional-style into Java using the Jakarta Commons Collections or Google Collections). Removal of checked exceptions would allow, as mentioned earlier, the block syntax to not have to deal with declaring exceptions all over the place. Having to declare checked exceptions in blocks makes the syntax worse instead of better, at least when I saw the various closure proposals for Java/JDK/whatever 7 which did not get included. Requiring types in the blocks is still annoying, especially once you get used to Ruby and Groovy, but it would be passable.

Native Property Syntax

The third change should do essentially what Groovy for properties does but should introduce a "property" keyword (i.e. don't rely on whether someone accidentally put an access modifier in there as Groovy does). The syntax could be very clean:

property String firstName;
property String lastName;
property Date dateOfBirth;

The compiler could automatically generate the appropriate getter/setter for you like Groovy does. This obviates the need to manually code the getter/setter. Like Groovy you should be able to override either or both. It de-clutters code enormously and removes a ton of lines of silly getter/setter code (plus JavaDocs if you are actually still writing them for every get/set method). Then you could reference properties as you would expect: person.name is the "getter" and person.name = "Fred" is the "setter." Much cleaner syntax, way less boilerplate code. By the way, if someone used the word "property" in their code, i.e. as a variable name, it is just not that difficult to rename refactor, especially with all the advanced IDEs in the Java community that do this kind of thing in their sleep.

Lots of other things could certainly be done, but if just these three were done I think Java would be much better off, and maybe it would even come into the 21st century like Objective-C. (See the very long but very good Ars Technica Snow Leopard review for information on Objective-C's new blocks feature.)

Dessert Improvements

If (as I suspect they certainly will :-) ) Sun/Oracle/whoever takes my suggestions and makes these changes and improves Java, then I'm sure they'll want to add in a few more for dessert. After the main course which removes checked exceptions, adds closures, and adds native property support, dessert includes the following:

  • Remove type-erasure and clean up generics
  • Add property/method handles
  • String interpolation
  • Type inference
  • Remove "new" keyword

Clean Up Generics

Generics should simply not remove type information when compiled. If you're going to have generics in the first place, do it correctly and stop worrying about backward compatibility. Keep type information in the bytecode, allow reflection on it, and allow me to instantiate a "new T()" where T is some type passed into a factory method, for example. I think an improved generics implementation could basically copy the way C# does it and be done.

Property/Method Handles

Property/method handles would allow you to reference a property or method directly. They would make code that now must use strings strongly typed and refactoring-safe (IDEs like IntelliJ already know how to search in text and strings but can never be perfect) much nicer. For example, a particular pet peeve of mine and I'm sure a lot of other developers is writing Criteria queries in Hibernate. You are forced to reference properties as simple strings. If the lastName property is changed to surname then you better make sure to catch all the places the String "lastName" is referenced. So you could replace code like this:

session.createCriteria(Person.class)
	.add(Restrictions.eq("lastName", "Smith")
	.addOrder(Order.asc("firstName")
	.list();

with this using method/property handles:

session.createCriteria(Person.class)
	.add(Restrictions.eq(Person.lastName, "Smith")
	.addOrder(Order.asc(Person.firstName)
	.list();

Now the code is strongly-typed and refactoring-safe. JPA 2.0 tries mightily to overcome having strings in the new criteria query API with its metamodel. But I find it pretty much appalling to even look at, what with having to create or code-generate a separate "metamodel" class which you reference like "_Person.lastName" or some similar awful way. This metamodel class lives only to represent properties on your real model object for the sole purpose of making JPA 2.0 criteria queries strongly typed. It just isn't worth it and is total overkill. In fact, it reminds me of the bad-old days of rampant over-engineering in Java (which apparently is still alive and well in many circles but I try to avoid it as best I can). The right thing is to fix the language, not to invent something that adds yet more boilerplate and more complexity to an already overcomplicated ecosystem.

Method handles could also be used to make calling methods using reflection much cleaner than it currently is, among other things. Similarly it would make accessing properties via reflection easier and cleaner. And with only unchecked exceptions you would not need to catch the four or five kinds of exceptions reflective code can throw.

String Interpolation

String interpolation is like the sorbet that you get at fancy restaurants to cleanse your palate. This would seem to be a no-brainer to add. You could make code like:

log.error("The object of type  ["
    + foo.getClass().getName()
    + "] and identifier ["
    + foo.getId()
    + "] does not exist.", cause);

turn into this much more palatable version (using the native property syntax I mentioned earlier):

log.error("The object of type [${foo.class.name}] and identifier [${foo.id}] does not exist.", cause);

Type Inference

I'd also suggest adding type inference, if only for local variables like C# does. Why do we have to repeat ourselves? Instead of writing:

Person person = new Person();

why can't we just write:

var person = new Person();

I have to believe the compiler and all the tools are smart enough to infer the type from the "new Person()". Especially since other strongly-typed JVM languages like Scala do exactly this kind of thing.

Elminate "new"

Last but not least, and actually not the last thing I can think of but definitely the last I'm writing about here, let's get rid of the "new" keyword and either go with Ruby's new method or Python's constructor syntax, like so:

// Ruby-like new method
var person = Person.new()

// or Python-like construction
var person = Person()

This one came to me recently after hearing Bruce Eckel give an excellent talk on language evolution and archaeology. He had a ton of really interesting examples of why things are they way they are, and how Java and other languages like C++ evolved from C. One example was the reason for "new" in Java. In C++ you can allocate objects on the stack or the heap, so there is a stack-based constructor syntax that does not use "new" while the heap-based constructor syntax uses the "new" operator. Even though Java only has heap-based object allocation, it retained the "new" keyword which is not only boilerplate code but also makes the entire process of object construction pretty much immutable: you cannot change anything about it nor can you easily add hooks into the object creation process.

I am not an expert at all in the low-level details, and Bruce obviously knows what he is talking about way more than I do, but I can say that I believe the Ruby and Python syntaxes are not only nicer but more internally consistent, especially in the Ruby case because there is no special magic or sauce going on. In Ruby, new is just a method, on a class, just like everything else.

Conclusion to this Way Too Long Blog Entry

I did not actually set out to write a blog whose length is worthy of a Ted Neward blog. It just turned out that way. (And I do in fact like reading Ted's long blogs!) Plus, I found out that speculative fiction can be pretty fun to write, since I don't think pretty much any of these things are going to make it into Java anytime soon, if ever, and I'm sure there are lots of people in the Java world who hate things like Ruby won't agree anyway.